Tuesday, February 08, 2011

The End of the Bestseller

Blake Crouch and I interview each other in the latest issue of Crimespree Magazine.

I've given up doing interviews, because I get a lot of requests and they all ask the same questions. While it's flattering, I hate taking time away from my writing, and I'm making enough money to stop doing things that I dislike.

That said, I did do a quick interview with Kirkus for Shaken, which is being released in print on February 22.

Some folks may be thinking, "But Joe, interviews are free publicity. If you stay out of the public eye, they'll forget you and stop buying your ebooks. Aren't you shooting yourself in the foot?"

I don't think so. Lots of authors shy away from the spotlight but still sell well. And I'm 99% convinced that name-recognition isn't what drives sales.

So what does?

In the print world, distribution is the Number 1 factor in sales. The more places your book is for sale, the more books you'll sell. It's very much a self-fulfilling prophecy that goes like this:

1. Publisher prints a shitload of books, gets them into as many retail outlets as possible.

2. Publisher buys coop in bookstores and big box stores, offering steep discounts for multiple copies, so the books can be sold for under the cover price.

3. Readers buy these books because they have little choice in places like drug stores, supermarkets, airports, etc, and because in bookstores it is the first thing they see when they walk in; big stacks of discounted books by familiar, safe names.

I don't believe an author becomes a bestseller, and then becomes available everywhere. I believe an author is available everywhere, and that's why they're a bestseller.

If you look at the Kindle bestseller lists, a lot of the ebooks selling well mirror their print counterparts. But more and more, self-published ebooks are creeping onto these lists, displacing traditionally published ebooks.

Obviously, distribution and coop don't play a part in ebook sales, because indie ebooks don't have any.

This allows me to make a rather startling prediction about the future.

The current print bestsellers dominate because they're available everywhere. Readers are creatures of habit. Used to buying Patterson in print, many of them will buy Patterson in ebook form because he is safe and familiar.

So let's do a thought experiment. Let's imagine that every place Patterson has a print book for sale, I also have an equal number of print books for sale. But whereas Patterson's paperbacks are $8.99, my paperbacks are $2.99.

Do you think he'd still outsell me in print?

Remember, for every book he has on the shelf, I have one that is equally displayed. Though he enjoys a much larger fanbase and name-recognition, if there were displays touting my price, I think I could outsell him.

A pipe dream? Hardly.

Because I DO outsell Patterson on many of the Kindle bestseller lists, simply because I have a lower price.

Now, if we take away Patterson's print sales (or at least reduce them when ebooks sales overtake print) it is simple to predict what will happen.

Ebooks are all equally distributed. They have an infinite shelf-life, and infinite shelf-space. Everywhere Patterson has an ebook, I have an ebook. And I can beat him on price, so I can beat him in sales.

Kindle readers are still buying overpriced bestsellers because that's how they're used to shopping. However, the many of the ereader owners I've spoken with are changing their buying habits.

At one time, the majority of readers bought what was widely distributed.

But with ereader owners, price is often a major factor in a purchase.

The Big 6 can't publish ebooks priced low enough to compete with me. They have fancy NY offices, lots of employees with benefits and expense accounts, and a whole industry to support.

With print, they know how to create a bestseller. They buy it.

They buy the real estate. They buy the advertising. They buy the discounts.

But in an ebook world, their money offers no advantage. They can't get more shelf space or a longer shelf life than I can, and they can't discount for less than I can.

Now certainly bestselling authors will still have fans when the print industry collapses, and those fans will have no choice but to switch to ebooks.

So far, those fans have been willing to put up with $9.99 and $12.99 prices.

I don't see this happening forever. Right now, we're in a transitional period. The stranglehold NY publishing has had on the US, forcing people to read what they decide to make available, is loosening up. When given a choice, readers will buy books other than those vetted by NY. The Kindle bestseller lists prove this. My sales prove this.

In the future, coop and distribution won't be the main reason a book sells. Price and content will be.

In said future, will Patterson be happy with 25% royalties on a $9.99 ebook when he could make more money self-pubbing a $2.99 ebook which would sell ten times as many copies?

I think not.

"But Joe," you may say, "When Patterson is self-pubbing at $2.99, how will you compete?"

That's the beauty of ebooks. There is no competition.

When I used to buy music, I was limited by price, by space, by the physicality of the object, and by the places it was available.

Price was prohibitive. A $15 CD meant I had to be picky and choosy when buying, lest I run out of money.

Space was prohibitive. After you buy a few hundred albums, you run out of places to put them.

The tangibility of a CD gave it weight, both physically and psychologically. It was an object that existed, which gave it value and permanence. Buying something valuable and permanent meant actually thinking about whether or not to make the purchase.

Often, I had to visit different stores to find the CD I wanted. This process took time, and effort.

Then iTunes came along.

Price was no longer prohibitive. I could cheaply buy whatever I wanted.

I didn't have to take up a shelf when I bought the music--it fit right on my hard drive.

Because it was one-click buying, I was more apt to download something than buy a tangible object. Which meant it required less thought. Ask any Kindle owner if they buy more books now that they own an ereader, and the overwhelming majority will say yes. Especially since the don't need to leave their house, or their sofa, to do so.

So let's apply this to books.

In the past, a reader would have to physically visit a store, then decide to buy Patterson's new hardcover for $15.99 or my new hardcover for $24.99 (if mine was even available there). To make this decision, the reader had to come to grips with the fact that they were buying an expensive, permanent object, that once purchased will take up space in the home.

Making decisions is tough. Especially when it comes to your entertainment dollar. Why take a chance on an unknown author for $25 when NY publishers make it easy to get a sure thing for $16?

So Patterson has vastly outsold me in print.

But with ebooks, it is much easier to make decisions. Cheap, intangible downloads don't require as much thought. Las Vegas has proven that once you take away cash and credit cards and replace them with chips and tokens, people are freer with their spending. The same thing applies to clicking a BUY NOW button on a computer or Kindle that is hooked up to your account.

So I'm no longer competing with Patterson. If he's $2.99 and I'm $2.99, readers won't hesitate to buy both of us.

In fact, once he and all the other bestselling authors start self-publishing and come down in price, that will leave more money in readers' pockets to spend on unknowns like me.

The next obvious question involves time. If every ebook is cheap, and readers pig out on them like we do at an all-you-can-eat buffet, where will anyone find the time to read all of those ebooks?

Answer: they won't.

Admit it, you've bought books before but haven't gotten around to reading them yet. Just like you've rented movies you didn't watch, bought music you haven't listened to, and bought a DVD set of some TV show that still has two discs you haven't gotten to yet.

We all have to-be-read piles. The Kindle has just made them bigger, cheaper, and easier to attain.

There is a lot of allure to pressing a button, getting an ebook download, and having it on your device to be read later. It's like a squirrel storing up nuts for winter. It gives us comfort knowing we have it.

Conclusions?

In the future, we will no longer have the same bestsellers we have now. People will be buying more books, but more of them will be going unread. There won't be competition, because no one goes to a buffet and gets the pizza or the lasagna--they get the pizza AND the lasagna, even if they don't eat one of them.

Ebooks will continue to gobble up market share once held by print books. Chain bookstores will close. Publishers will have to downsize or go bankrupt. Big name authors will self-publish, making less money than they did before, but having more control and getting a larger percentage of royalties. The playing field will truly be even, readers will find what they want to read without having it crammed down their throats by NY, and the cream will rise to the top.

And that, my friends, is a fairy tale ending in every sense of the term.

237 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 237 of 237
jtplayer said...

that bowerbid...so clever, so astute, so aware.

the very epitome of hipster cool.

you are on your game dude...goddamn impressive shit for sure.

so keep up the good work able-bodied wingman.

and by all means, don't let the "morons" drag you into "petty squabbles", because you are so much better than that.

-jt

Gary Ponzo said...

The question is: How do publishers make money selling their best-selling author's ebooks at $2.99?
I don't think they can, too many hands in the pocket to be a profitable venture. Therefore an opening occurs in the marketplace for authors who don't have to rely on their ebooks as their primary income.
Is it that simple? Or can the publishers change the game somehow to squeeze out the indies?
They're not that nearsighted are they?

Lundeen Literary said...

Well, I forgot two negative side effects of the instant upload and instant fix possibilities of the epublishing revolution:

1 - people not bothering to get their file completely correct before they send it to the formatter.

2 - George Lucas Syndrome. As in "I don't really like how I wrote that sentence, so can you go to chapter nine, paragraph 27 and change the phrase that begins with..." The end result is that Greedo shoots first in the new version.

Both of these issues result in one thing: incessant calls or emails leading to HOURS of changes per file, which then need to be migrates to the various file formats. O_o *twitch*

...then there are the calls and emails to change the text BACK TO THE ORIGINAL VERSION!!! O_O

...then the calls of "I showed this to three new people and they suggested three new sets of changes..." *sob*

...and then Amazon's uploader doesn't cooperate... *headdesk**headdesk**headdesk*

Forgive me, I'm being dramatic. By far, most authors do not do this, and I certainly don't mind fixing typos or a few minor changes. But I have 3 or 4 George Lucas wannabees. They're driving me to drink.

So please, remember to fully vet your MS before moving towards publishing - your programmer's liver will thank you! /public service annoncement

'scuse me, I'm going to go crawl in a hole now...

Jenna
@LundeenLiterary
www.lundeenliterary.com

Anonymous said...

Grrrr. Sorry for the repost, JA. I accidentally posted on an older thread.

Interesting Amazon statistic of the day (having to do with my ranking):

#53 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Science Fiction > High Tech

#62 in Books > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Science Fiction > High Tech


Am I reading this correctly to mean that only 9 NON-Kindle books are in the top 60-ish for that particular category? Are other people seeing similar things? Are we reaching that tipping point in certain genres where eBooks are dominating the Top Seller lists?

David Wisehart said...

Re: Drunkard's Walk

I used to work with Leonard Mlodinow in the educational software business. Great guy. Haven't read this book (yet!) but I can recommend "Euclid's Window."

David

Lundeen Literary said...

@Tara Maya

Don't get me started on SF series on TV. Just. Don't. Or the SyFy network, actually. I curse them. CURSE.

I will say that I have become a big fan of some web series now, and I don't watch actual TV anymore. I stream episodes on Netflix if they make it that far, or else borrow the DVD from someone.

BTW, The Guild is AWESOME!!! Wil Wheaton in a web series on gamers FTW! Search it. Watch it. It's also streaming on Netflix. This type of production is the future of Sci-fi on TV. Mainly because TV sucks. Especially reality TV.


Anonymous @2:25 pm

I don't think everyone is whining, necessarily. However, epublishing is turning out to be great for folks with those near misses in the publishing industry. It's only logical that folks would share that info here, and be delighted to find others in the same position. It's not whining, it's showing others that some level of success IS possible.

In his memoir On Writing, Stephen King talks about his pre-published life. He wrote, and in order to pay the bills, he did restaurant laundry. As in, laundry in Maine covered with maggots and rotting shellfish bits. Eeew. By your definition, the world doesn't owe him jack, so to complain about that makes him a whiner. By my definition, he gives me hope that I never have to wait tables again. Which is why I'm halfway there already - I've only worked 6 shifts in 4 months, and support myself by assisting other writers. I have several works nearing publication, so that side of my life will begin rolling forward. I was helped by other writers who let me know that they had dealt with the same crap I did, and was therefore able to make a change.

The difference is that you're coming at this from a position of negativity, and we're coming at this from a position of community.

Oh, and maybe Amanda Hocking is the next James Patterson, in terms of talent level, marketing technique, and copying hits. Good for her. I'm sure she's real upset to be called a rip-off artist, but she now has plenty of money to rub on that to make her feel better.

I know what I'd choose: financial success to enable my artistic goals. If it came down to it, you'd make that choice, too. :)

Jenna
@Lundeenliterary
www.lundeenliterary.com

Anonymous said...

Teabag my shit: You’re 15 right?

That's hilarious coming from someone who calls himself "Ego Detector."

I'm detecting a swollen ego, too.

YOURS.

Selena Kitt said...

"But I have 3 or 4 George Lucas wannabees. They're driving me to drink."

Charge an additional uploading fee every time there's a change. That will make sure they go over their mss' with a fine tooth comb beforehand. And will keep the George Lucas's from driving you to drink.

Blake Crouch said...

Dear Anon 2:25: takes a lot of guts to write some vitriolic shit anonymously, doesn't it? Get some balls or some ovaries and put your name to it.

S.J. Harris said...

One of the many smart things it proves is that success is a random event...It also goes on to say the harder you work, the luckier you get.

Doesn't it have to be one way or the other? If you can change your luck by working harder (and I believe you can), then success isn't really a random event, is it?

Oh, hello, btw. Just published my first indie title on Kindle. I've read several of your books, Joe, and I think they're great. Enjoying the conversation here!

Anonymous said...

Lundeen I'm sorry but you make the same "I have a lot of money" argument that everyone else makes.

It's very short sighted.

It's akin to saying if I can just make enough money doing porno movies I can then get started on my legitimate artistic career.

And as for negative. re-read everything on this board from people who didn't make it.

People fail. so what. It's part of life. Some fail at one thing only to have an epiphany and see that they are great at something else.

Also, what you won't hear on this board is the fact that there are millions of people who don't give a shit about the .99 cents and buy what they like.

Everyone assumes that people are comparison shopping against things that are higher priced and then have this notion pop into their head: "I know what I'll do, I'll price it low so that people will get a bargain."

Well now you have ten's if not hundred's of thousands of these items. What separates .99 cent novel #1 from .99 cent novel #89,863?

And money doesn't buy happiness.

So please stop with this line of thinking.

All of the early Lotto winners had millions too. Go do a google search and see where some of these people ended up.

Then give me the money schpiel again.

Selena Kitt said...

Get some balls or some ovaries and put your name to it.

Anonymous needs a mirror. A great big one. Not that I really believe they're gonna ever get it... but seeing monkeys react to their own reflections can be mildly amusing for the humans. ;)

JA Konrath said...

Dear Anon 2:25: takes a lot of guts to write some vitriolic shit anonymously, doesn't it? Get some balls or some ovaries and put your name to it

LOL. Why would anyone with half a brain want to put their name on a bad argument?

Troll rating: 3 out of 10

Logic rating: 2 out of 10

I wouldn't sign my name to that shit either.

But then, I don't make lousy arguments...

bowerbird said...

gary said:
> The question is:
> How do publishers make money
> selling their best-selling
> author's ebooks at $2.99?
> I don't think they can,
> too many hands in the pocket
> to be a profitable venture.

actually, the corporate publishers
can make more money at a lower
price just like everyone else, _if_
we look only at the e-book side.

however, it would cannibalize the
print side, so they will not do it.

***

jenna said:
> which then need to be migrates
> to the various file formats.

change "migrates" to "migrated"...

then change your workflow. ;+)

you need to have a "master file"
which propagates all the formats,
so you just make an edit _once_.

i have programmed such a tool,
and it will be coming out soon...

and it will be available at no cost,
as my gift to authors everywhere.

-bowerbird

JA Konrath said...

but seeing monkeys react to their own reflections can be mildly amusing for the humans.

When you say things like this it gets me a little bit hot for you. Don't tell my wife. ;)

JA Konrath said...

Oh, Mr. Crouch...

@Anon.

I deleted your comment. You're being an ass.

Be nice or go play elsewhere. This is your only warning.

JA Konrath said...

Plonk plonk plonk goes another anonymous asshole...

Apologies to the folks who play nice. But, Christ, it's fun as hell to piss off the trolls. :)

JA Konrath said...

Ahh, Anon.

Wanting so badly to post your garbage, but I've turned off anonymous posting.

Sucks hard to be you, doesn't it?

Poor baby.

S.J. Harris said...

Um, why do my posts keep getting deleted?

Blake Crouch said...

Post it! Please! You've got to admit, Anon 2:25 is really funny in a ragey sort of way. If they ever start a blog called Anon 2:25I'll be there.

JA Konrath said...

Post it! Please!

My blog is a place for healthy, intelligent discourse, where people can debate without feeling alienated.

When some pinhead starts getting rowdy, it ruins it for everyone, but I gotta lock things down until he goes and masturbates elsewhere.

JA Konrath said...

@ SJ - I've only deleted anonymous posts. Checked the spam filter and you weren't in it. Try reposting.

S.J. Harris said...

Thanks, Joe. I was starting to get paranoid there for a minute, lol.

For anyone who's interested, I will gift copies of my debut thriller in exchange for Amazon reviews. Just email me.

sjharrisbooks@rocketmail.com

Selena Kitt said...

Healthy discourse, unhealthy (and sometimes naughty) habits and unholy profits. Oh the chicanery that is Joe's blog! Damn you Konrath, I said stop distracting me!

Lundeen Literary said...

@Selena -

Oh, these Lucas wannabes were under an earlier deal - now I charge $75/hour to make changes, with a 3-hour minimum… ;) I learned that lesson the very very hard way.

And for the monkey comment, I award you one internet! XD


@bowerbird -

Fine, make fun of my typos! Kick me when I'm down! ;)

I should have been more clear - these are folks who also have paper versions of their books. Unfortunately, I have not yet found a way to magically turn paper into an ebook, or else I would have. :( These books in question have at least 2 formats which are completely incompatible with the other.

I'll be interested in your tool when it comes out. If it worked for the formatting issues I routinely have in either pub or Kindle, but not both, I will sing your praises from the rooftops and videotape it. Honest.

Jenna
@lundeenliterary

Lundeen Literary said...

@Anonymous whateveryourtimeis

Don't assume that I'm making the same mistake. Money doesn't buy happiness, but it does buy my back hurting less because I'm not carrying trays for 12 hours a day. For full artistic freedom, and to not have to work doing anything else except my art, I only need about $30k/year. That's not a lot of money in America (although that amount would make me approximately the 100 millionth richest person on the planet, or richer than 95% of the rest of the world - just to keep in in true perspective). I don't want to win the lotto. I'm not greedy, I'd just like a little more control over my own time. If I knew I could have control for several years by doing one-shot hackery, I'd do it. It's better than handing mongolian beef to the masses forever. I'm considering a move to India, which would mean that I could live doing my art pretty easily.

And I know about those lotto winners. Don't assume that I don't. Again, I'm not asking for millions. I am, however, taking my employment life into my own hands while writing continually. I highly doubt that my writing will make me rich compared to other Americans, which is fine with me. I don't need a luxury car. But if I can live to work and not work to live, I'll change up what's necessary.

Actually, we ARE hearing about the millions who don't give a shit about the $.99 price point and buying what they like. Some of those millions are buying Amanda Hocking because she's giving them what they like. They don't care about the price, they care that she's got the good stuff. (at least what's good stuff to those buyers. that genre doesn't float my boat)

I agree with you that I really don't care about price point. If it's good, and I can afford it, I'll buy it if I want to. I don't comparison shop based on price when it comes to art.

Yeah, people do fail. And the people who fail the most are the ones who eventually win the most, because they learned from each failure and kept trying.

Jenna

S.J. Harris said...

I'm hoping the $.99 price point will work as an introductory offer. I'm just hoping to get some reviews and get my name out there. Seems like $.99 would be an impulse buy for a lot of people.

bowerbird said...

jenna said:
> these are folks who also have
> paper versions of their books.

as in previously-published books?


> Unfortunately, I have not yet
> found a way to magically
> turn paper into an ebook

for a previously-published book,
o.c.r. will take you fairly close...
from there, my format kicks in.

if, on the other hand, you mean
they want to _produce_ p-books
in addition to e-books, use .pdf,
which is just another one of the
formats which my tool delivers.
(indesign is a thing of the past.)


> These books in question
> have at least 2 formats which
> are completely incompatible
> with the other.

and those formats would be?


> If it worked for the
> formatting issues I routinely
> have in either pub or Kindle,
> but not both

as i want my tool to be useful,
i'll take those issues seriously,
but only to a certain degree...

the kindle is much too primitive
to take its shortfalls seriously...

and .epub is much too fractured
to solve all the inconsistencies
between different viewer-apps.

so at some point, i'll just say
"you'll have to talk with the
other side to get that solved."

i've also made a cross-platform
viewer for my master-format
which blows the other viewers
out of the water. unequivocally.


> I'll be interested in your tool
> when it comes out.

if you (or anyone else) wants to
see a preview copy now, tell me.
...bowerbird at aol dot com...

-bowerbird

Jacob Martin said...

I've yet to enter the publishing industry, but I'm probably part of the generation that will live to see both eBook bestseller lists and flying cars. Yeah, I probably will live to see flying cars. Did I ask for it? No. I don't even enjoy regular cars because regular cars have traumatised me on several occasions.

eBooks seem to be pretty neat, but since my shrink already explained to me that just because I'm Australian "doesn't mean I'm doomed to live in a Road Warrior future during my retirement." And likewise, the iPad "does not represent the death of everything you hold dear".

I'm less worried about eBooks becoming a success than well, the Road Warrior future where nobody's iPad works anymore. And I will miss bookshops I can physically walk into.

There's still this place in the city I go to that during lunchtimes (I went to school in the city) I'd go to that bookshop and nerd out, have a hot chocolate and relax. I'd probably miss the place if it was gone, but humanity is well known for innovation when man has too much time on his hands. I know this because "man having too much time on his hands" led to me becoming an artist and writer of books that are yet unpublished.

By the time my book is anywhere near ready to publish I imagine there will be lots of options open for me. I might be Australian but the internet distribution of ebooks may well blow the tyranny of distance out of the water. There's a line in Jurassic Park where Ian Malcolm says "life cannot be contained... life finds a way".

Maybe life will find a way for indie ebooks and maybe I might be part of that eventually.

evilphilip said...

"It's not so much that I think it's a fluke (the ebook does seem to be inarguably the wave of the future), but that the big publishers would probably like to put a halt to indie publishing if they could manage it somehow. I'm not sure how they would manage that, but it does worry me a bit."

Part of me wonders if big publishers don't see the self publishers as any kind of competition.

I was posting to some forums today and another writer was talking about how he could make more money going the traditional route than going indie.

I can't see how. On my own I'm going to make more money over the next 24 months than I know his advance was for his last book -- and that advance was split into three chunks. He probably hasn't even received the final piece yet and every month money from Amazon keeps showing up in my bank account right on time, almost like a paycheck.

Despite the success of people like Amanda Hocking, I think traditional publishers are going to keep telling themselves that they are doing it better than you can do on your own and keep ignoring the indies until they find themselves pushed right off the bestseller lists.

I do agree with a lot of people here -- you can expect them to push back at some point and the best way they can push back is to "Buy" slots on the bestseller list. Amazon is a business, don't think they won't go for it.

However, I don't think that will help them in the long run. A Patterson might be the #1 title on the thriller list because some big publisher "purchased" that #1 slot, but it won't keep your book from selling and it won't keep you from being #2 or #10 or somewhere that puts you pretty much right next to those pre-purchased Top 10 titles from the big publishers.

Unknown said...

I think your "The End of the Bestseller" title should possibly read "The Changing of the Bestseller."
http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/46027-the-times-shakes-its-lists.html

~Chryse
http://www.thisdarkmagic.weebly.com

Lundeen Literary said...

@bowerbird

I use InDesign to design paper books. Getting Indesign text to Kindle is a BITCH. Generating a PDF to then convert to Kindle goes even worse! And of course, it all starts with Word documents out of which I have to clean the trash coding to get into InDesign, then export into an ePub editor, finalize that version, then do the alterations needed for Kindle, then do an epub to mobi conversion, THEN test to see if it works on the Kindle. Ergh. Insert backpedaling if something doesn't work. It's usually easier just to load the text directly into the editor and start from there for an epub.

Some things would be SO much easier if Kindle allowed a custom right margin set...

When these people come to me, they usually do not have a paper book in existence. I'm making it for them.

If you say InDesign is of the past, what do you use for doing exacting layout of paper books? Now I'm curious... I generate a PDF from InDesign for Createspace uploads.

I'll be sending you an email - I hope your tool works on a Mac...

Robin Sullivan said...

Joe Konrath said But I'm convinced that writers have a *much* better shot of finding an audience through self-pubbing, and also will sell more books this way, than through the gatekeepers.

I would say if you are starting from square 1 this is absolutely true because the long lead time of going traditional.

If you want "good" sales - I also agree. The numbers that Joe and my husband Michael are making - its much more likely to do as self-pubed rather than traditional. That's a way of saying...if you are selling at a "mid list level" then you are better off doing that self as you get a higher % of the deal.

But...if you are talking about "making it really big". (i.e. introducing yourself at a dinner party and having someone know your name...) then only traditional (IMO) will get you there. Even Amazda who has sold 500,000 books is unknown out of our little echo chamber. Go to any high school (her demographic) and ask kids about her - and they've never heard of her....I know I've asked this as Michael is doing talks at High School presently. But ask the same question of Meyer or Charline Harris -- much different response.

So...if you want to make a VERY good living - Then sucessful self publishing is the way to go. If you want to "break out" then I think traditional is still your best bet.

Robin Write2Publish

bowerbird said...

jenna said:
> I use InDesign to
> design paper books.
> Getting Indesign text
> to Kindle is a BITCH.
> Generating a PDF to then
> convert to Kindle goes
> even worse! And of course, it
> all starts with Word documents
> out of which I have to
> clean the trash coding
> to get into InDesign, then
> export into an ePub editor,
> finalize that version, then do
> the alterations needed
> for Kindle, then do
> an epub to mobi conversion,
> THEN test to see if it works
> on the Kindle.

yes, that sounds fairly typical
of what most designers will do.

some authors who are willing
to give up any ability to alter
the final products use calibre,
a free format-converter tool.

in my software, an author can
write the book in the tool itself
(or copy in the text), and then
click a button to get this:

1. a nice, powerful .pdf and

2. a nice, powerful .html-book.

3. drop #2 on an epub-zipper
and you have an .epub file.

4. then just drop #3 on the
kindle previewer for a .mobi,
the format used by the kindle.

the process is easy enough that
an author can do it every day,
to view the work-in-progress...

-bowerbird

Rai Aren said...

Hey Joe,

As always, great post, lots of valuable information, so thanks!

I've followed some of Joe's suggestions, released a new second edition & have been seeing sales steadily increase. I am reaching more readers than ever before, and for this I am truly grateful. I've sold several thousand copies & counting, and happily reply to the regular fan e-mails that come in. The book is consistently on several bestseller lists between Amazon.com & UK.

Joe's teachings were an awakening for me, and I am not looking back. I am very excited about this new playing field!

btw - I have tweeted some things people have recommended here - thanks for the links, peeps! I am also checking into some cool offers & sites people have mentioned in these comments.

Good to see some familiar names/books/faces here. I like this community of scribes & book peeps :)

I'd also like to mention that I have received Amazon recommendations for indie books many times - it's great!

I'm slowly getting better acquainted with reading eBooks, and boy, I love it! The ease, the instant availability, and yes, I ran out of room for books in my house (after maxing out new shelving options). I regularly donate books, but it still overwhelmed my shelves. Ebooks rock! And I save $$ and read more!

Cheers,

Rai Aren, co-author of the award-winning mystery novel SECRET OF THE SANDS

www.secretofthesands.com

@raiaren

Robin Sullivan said...

Hey RaiAren - I've been watching your book climbing nicely on Kindle - good for you - here's to more success.

Robin | Write2Publish | Michael J. Sullivan's Writings

Rai Aren said...

Thanks so much Robin! I really appreciate that :)

I've been super impressed by yours & Michael's results. His books are doing great! I see his books/presence in lots of places - no doubt as a result of your consistent/combined efforts and his writing talent. You are both class acts!

Wishing you continued success...

Rai

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 237 of 237   Newer› Newest»