tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post9096632719030402429..comments2024-03-18T06:16:18.802-05:00Comments on A Newbie's Guide to Publishing: E-books in Libraries: They Still Don't Get ItJA Konrathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08778324558755151986noreply@blogger.comBlogger132125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-51372050084007343102015-11-30T11:09:50.634-06:002015-11-30T11:09:50.634-06:00There are so many different aspects when it comes ...There are so many different aspects when it comes to this topic. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge on this particular aspect.<br /><a href="http://keramiektafelblad-kopen.nl" rel="nofollow">keramiek tafelblad</a> <br />Raza abbashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617948434947771749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-35015006422747270092015-11-30T11:09:17.784-06:002015-11-30T11:09:17.784-06:00The information you shared through your post is fu...The information you shared through your post is functional. I admire your work. Wish you all the luck for all your blogging efforts. <br />keramiek tafelbladhttp://keramiektafelblad-kopen.nlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-24382230995027688412013-07-17T13:50:26.031-05:002013-07-17T13:50:26.031-05:00I really want my ebooks in libraries. I wouldn'...I really want my <b><a href="http://noebooks.com/" rel="nofollow">ebooks</a></b> in libraries. I wouldn't put a limit on how many lends. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17998288497073640521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-44848324031924113282013-01-08T10:11:24.897-06:002013-01-08T10:11:24.897-06:00I'd be very interested in connecting with x, o...I'd be very interested in connecting with x, or participate in any listing of ebooks to libraries. I live in Berkeley County, South Carolina, and have already donated 6 copies of my award winning cozy mystery to our local library system. I'd love to make the electronic version available as well.<br />Karla Telega<br />tartcoookies@gmail.com Karla Telegahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04620936586826306747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-28985848435780858232012-12-18T04:13:51.940-06:002012-12-18T04:13:51.940-06:00"Thanks for your marvelous posting! I quite e..."Thanks for your marvelous posting! I quite enjoyed reading it, you are a<br />great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will<br />come back from now on. I want to encourage that you continue your great<br />job, have a nice day!"<br /><br /><a href="http://www.aoneessays.com/assignment-writing-service.php" rel="nofollow"> Assignment Help</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02399622176836301522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-31632626810927287582012-10-25T16:11:36.854-05:002012-10-25T16:11:36.854-05:00I work in a large public library. This post is th...I work in a large public library. This post is the best thing I've read that adequately describes the current situation with publishers restrictions on e-books. Thank you Librarian X for so eloquently stating what I've been feeling.<br />I think the publishing industry is going to be in the same sad shape as the recording industry if they don't wise up quickly to 21st Century business models.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-84266435004754448182012-10-16T23:07:35.816-05:002012-10-16T23:07:35.816-05:00Additionally, couldn't all the seemingly stupi...Additionally, couldn't all the seemingly stupid behavior be just delaying tactics. The publishers are coming from a place of power. Why not make ridiculous demands and mess with the libraries negotiation teams head? Worst comes to worse the libraries might actually agree and then the publishers will just up the ante some more to the point where the libraries have to back down. Sometimes what looks to be 'very stupid behavior' is actually just smart behavior cloaked under the wool of stupidity.<br /><br />Simply: Make demands the libraries can't meet, but keep the negotiations going. After things are in a position that you want them to be then offer a fair deal. If human nature is anything to go by the fair deal will be snapped up (probably it would be offered in such a way as to make it look like the publisher relented against a powerful attack.) It's just a game...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-86384751691269669002012-10-16T23:00:53.054-05:002012-10-16T23:00:53.054-05:00I feel for LX, but I don't feel that tradition...I feel for LX, but I don't feel that traditional publishers are doing the wrong thing. They are the only one's who have numbers that can really tell them if they are making any sort of decent return on e-book library sales. I, personally, think that it makes sense to focus on selling paper books (to keep that going and as a way to keep paper books going strong). It is better to wait until e-books are so firmly entrenched that paper books are solidly in decline that it becomes necessary.<br /><br />Of course, most indie publishers and small presses would disagree, but question: Why do you care? Think about that. Beyond just considering that it's sort of unfair and 'not nice' to act the way they are (clue: Business is not always what we want or think it should be), does this actually affect us or matter? I have my books going to libraries through Smashwords. I'm very happy about that. My self interest by far trumps whatever minor interest I might have in this situation. In fact, I am actually pleased that the Big 6 is playing poker with libraries. They are making it much easier for me to sell to libraries. For that I am grateful - emotionally, I welcome their decision (and also think it is good for them at the same time on an analytical level.)<br /><br />What I am saying, in summary is two things: 1) You can get emotionally involved and get excited and maybe even do something that may or may not be useful to your own needs; 2) It's just not that bigger deal: Meaning, there are two parties this effects - Publishers (and those published by them) and libraries.<br /><br />Let me ask you this: If the library is not spending their annual book budget on Big 6 e-books for various reasons, who are the ones they will spend money on? You got it - YOU. Say thanks to the Big 6 for their help.<br /><br />@ Joe...<br /><br />I think I get that you and other traditionally published authors don't like this, but from an indie perspective (meaning the part of you that is purely an indie author), do you really care? (Apart from wanting to get your books into libraries in as plentiful numbers - perhaps what I want to know is if the overall issue Publishers VS Libraries is of interest to you, beyond your personal goals, or is it more that you want to see indies, especially yourself, in libraries as much as possible?)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-77440404423092706752012-10-12T07:15:37.690-05:002012-10-12T07:15:37.690-05:00Very exciting post and idea. I'd be happy to n...Very exciting post and idea. I'd be happy to network on and contribute to hiring a full-time person to organize this. It's a great job for someone and I'm sure the right person is just an e mail away.Alexandra Sokoloffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02881770599534651858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-90703454301522217892012-10-11T07:56:04.392-05:002012-10-11T07:56:04.392-05:00Don't think I'm going along with this idea...Don't think I'm going along with this idea, Joe. I think there are two central reasons piracy hasn't proven to be much of a threat: it's a little more trouble to deal with torrent files, and it Feels Wrong to many people. Library ebook lending removes both those limitations.<br /><br />I'm not really seeing the problem with treating ebooks like paper books when it comes to libraries. That's how Amazon's lending library works. I mean, why not?Becca Millshttp://the-active-voice.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-82024849714956609832012-10-10T04:40:34.352-05:002012-10-10T04:40:34.352-05:00If we allow libraries to make unlimited copies, th...If we allow libraries to make unlimited copies, then the IT cost is very low. All the library really has to pay for is the bandwidth, which is very minimal for text (and cheap to begin with). <br /><br />With a bit of HTML5 and your kindle e-mail address, it is simple to make an app that bypasses the Kindle (or Apple) store and allows books to be sent to a Kindle almost exactly like buying them from Amazon.<br /><br />There's no reason one library couldn't serve an entire state. This might not happen, but you can bet libraries would consolidate (there are only 3,000 counties in the US). <br /><br />Eventually it would be simpler to download the book than to buy it (no need to enter a credit card number). Just give the library your kindle e-mail address and download all the books you want.<br />Heck, since the library can just make more copies, why even require readers to return them?<br /><br />Unlimited copies is a nice idea, but I'm afraid Lee is right in the long run it's just not viable for authors or publishers.MJ Warehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03404933970338893489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-91153317415334388252012-10-09T18:46:59.258-05:002012-10-09T18:46:59.258-05:00Michael Mocker McClung said:
"I've got a...Michael Mocker McClung said:<br /><br />"I've got a busy week."<br /><br />A mocker's work is never done. So many quips so little time.<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-11810532053835113772012-10-09T16:00:20.357-05:002012-10-09T16:00:20.357-05:00Thank you Librarian X for wonderfully stating the ...Thank you Librarian X for wonderfully stating the problem. I would be more than happy to offer my book "Nirvana: Absolute Freedom" for e-book lending through libraries at the same reasonable terms mentioned by Joe.Kannanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01848267083750192063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-73767393095460925882012-10-09T15:58:45.862-05:002012-10-09T15:58:45.862-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Kannanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01848267083750192063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-21070881987595417892012-10-09T14:53:13.753-05:002012-10-09T14:53:13.753-05:00Anonymous Librarian X said...
@J.E. Mullaney.... Anonymous Librarian X said...<br /><br /> @J.E. Mullaney. That IS the current library model. One person can have a copy of the book out at one time until they return it. (just like a regular printed book).<br />(...)<br /> Publishers had no problems agreeing to the "one copy per person at a time" model but now they don't like it and want to change the game. <br />***<br /><br />I agree - and I think the current library model makes sense, minus any profit-generating ideas such as limiting the number of lendings and the ridiculous overpricing to libraries.<br /><br />In short, common sense would dictate a simple solution, except for the industry desperately trying to maintain revenue streams that simply no longer apply.<br /><br />And I'm one of the authors who told Joe K. that I'd happily join in on his proposed plan for library sales. I have no ties or loyalty to legacy publishers.J.E. Mullanynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-83954431213951266712012-10-09T10:42:11.646-05:002012-10-09T10:42:11.646-05:00Well, Anonymous, you certainly didn't disappoi...Well, Anonymous, you certainly didn't disappoint!<br /><br />Let me give a general summary of your contribution to this discussion first, and then set about the specific mocking.<br /><br />General Summary: Concern Troll<br /><br />Point-by-point mockery:<br /><br /><i>The discussion was about marketing ebooks to libraries.</i><br /><br />That's the general discussion. Our particular little squabble centers around literacy. How soon you forget.<br /><br /><i>Can't disagree with any of that but it wasn't really what we were talking about. We're discussing "Ebooks in Libraries: They Still Don't Get It!"</i> Please see above. In case you forgot. Again.<br /><br /><i>That's good to know. I've yet to meat someone who thought otherwise.</i> Usually I let typos slide, but since you're so worried about them, I thought I'd better point out that 'meating' someone is probably illegal, and definitely unfriendly.<br /><br /><i>If that means libraries need good books, I agree.</i><br /><br />It means libraries need good phonics and reading instruction books.<br /><br /><i>But good spelling will trump bad spelling any day. Ask Dan "Potatoe" Quayle.</i><br /><br />The snark is strong with this one.<br /><br />"In short, intimating that poor grammar or spelling in a book will push a reader (even a young reader once they are reading independently for their age level) down the road to illiteracy is baseless."<br /><br /><i>I didn't say it would. I did intimate that it might.</i> Witness, the Mighty Splitter of Hairs!<br /><br /><i>You'll only find out whether it is baseless or not when libraries start issuing badly spelled books and the effects of the policy can be tested.</i> Um, no. I'm telling you it's baseless because I already know it is. But if you want to do study, go for it.<br /><br /><i>But, as I intimated, I'd rather not take the risk.</i> Your concern is touching. Or rather it would be, if it were sincere.<br /><br /><i>And if you are telling me that you don't care if the books you use to teach with are badly spelled, then remind me never to employ you.</i><br /><br />Two things here: First, you couldn't afford me anyway. Second, don't (intentionally) confuse instruction material with self-published fiction, mmmkay?<br /><br />"there are much scarier, much more real threats out there than some poorly edited, self-published book."<br /><br /><i>Ah you tease! Let's hear them.</i><br /><br />You really *weren't* paying attention, were you?<br /><br />Please feel free to comment away. I'll cede the ground to you from here on out. I've got a busy week.Michael McClunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14708067144914238641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-75305960030342200732012-10-09T10:17:34.913-05:002012-10-09T10:17:34.913-05:00@J.E. Mullaney. That IS the current library model....@J.E. Mullaney. That IS the current library model. One person can have a copy of the book out at one time until they return it. (just like a regular printed book).<br /><br />So, as several others have said, you can wait for a copy to become available or you can just run out and buy the book. <br /><br />Libraries do not have a problem with this. We'll buy additional copies if demand for a book is shown. What we have a problem with is being charged 4+ times retail price or not even being able to buy the book at all.<br /><br />Publishers had no problems agreeing to the "one copy per person at a time" model but now they don't like it and want to change the game. Librarian Xnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-10174958219885998682012-10-09T10:02:26.227-05:002012-10-09T10:02:26.227-05:00Hi Joe,
Regarding libraries, it occurs to me that...Hi Joe,<br /><br />Regarding libraries, it occurs to me that this is just a continuation of legacy publishing's self-absorption, and I don't say that just to throw insults or jump in with the cool kids. But pre-ebooks there was a rationale for each aspect of the business. Specifically to this case, libraries were charged more because the books sold to them had "library binding." This gave them greater durability to stand up to the heavier-than-average usage that libraries could expect. Even so, eventually the books wore out and had to be replaced. These constraints go away with e-books.<br /><br />Cue the publishers' response to these costs going away: "Great! Now it's pure profit when we continue doing exactly as before!" It's the same as when ebooks took away all the costs of printing, warehousing, shipping, distribution expertise, etc. and the publishers responded by simply pocketing the savings. ($12.99 ebook, seriously?)<br /><br />Here's where the self-absorption comes in. Rather than looking at this as a new paradigm for books, they instead look at their own business, their revenue streams, and try to maintain each. Revenue line item for replacing worn out books to libraries? Maintain this by forcing libraries to buy again after 25 lendings. I have a Marketing MBA, so I know wherever there is a cost, you charge for it, plus a profit on top, so a cost line item is really a profit generator, so publishers are trying to maintain a line item for profit.<br /><br />This is further evidence of an industry refusing to look at how things are, and are instead trying desperately to make the new world fit into their existing structure. Further evidence of a doomed industry. <br /><br />But door close - window open, there's a new business here. If I were an editor at one of these publishers, I'd get some of my screeners and approach the library association. Someone is going to have to vet ebooks for quality and give a seal of approval for purchase by libraries. This function used to be done by the publishing industry. (If they put $$$ into printing it, then it must meet minimum specs, right?) Libraries simply can't afford to buy every ebook, (some % of these will be crap) and it would be very inefficient to have each library try to vet for themselves. I'd charge authors $25-50 to read their book and if it passed specs, it would be placed on the list of approved books for library purchase.<br /><br />It's a whole new world in publishing. And once you understand that publishers know that, but are milking the current system for all that they can, then you can leave them behind without a second thought. I did. I have published one book so far, and I never gave legacy publishing serious consideration. (7 rejections to my name! Oh the agony.)<br /><br />J.E. (Joe) Mullany<br />J.E. Mullanynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-10973835973114414392012-10-09T09:19:23.216-05:002012-10-09T09:19:23.216-05:00Regarding the concern about this re: nobody would ...Regarding the concern about this re: nobody would ever buy a book again...<br /><br />Simply limit the # of people it can be loaned out to at any given time. This will mean that if your book is great, then there will be a waiting list - therefore another copy purchased for lending. Others who don't want to wait, will buy the book.<br /><br />The libraries will have to become gatekeepers for book acceptance. Before, the publishers served as this - if they spent the money publishing it then the library could assume it met the minimum standard. Now librarians will have to - or a 3rd party that does this for them. (Ever want to get paid to read? New business opportunity!)<br />J.E. Mullanynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-67709148250204039342012-10-09T07:53:36.623-05:002012-10-09T07:53:36.623-05:00Here is a website that contains the selection poli...Here is a website that contains the selection policies for many US libraries:<br /><br />http://www.acqweb.org/cd_policy.html<br /><br />I haven't checked them all but two items that contribute to a book being selected are good reviews, from a selection of trusted sources, and the reputation of the author.<br /><br />Self-published books are mentioned and must meet the same selection criteria as any other books. Which suggests that unless libraries relax their selection criteria they are unlikely to welcome books simply because they are offered or even on the basis of Amazon reviews.<br /><br />However, I'd imagine that as digital publishing grows, these policies will be reviewed.<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-70057326321070162052012-10-09T07:21:24.380-05:002012-10-09T07:21:24.380-05:00There is an interesting interview here from Librar...There is an interesting interview here from Librarian Marlene Harris:<br /><br />http://www.ilovelibraries.org/getting-your-self-published-book-library-tips-librarian-marlene-harris<br /><br />Contains some information about how libraries choose their books (via reviews) and also about the difficulty of getting ebooks into libraries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-35155073434339776512012-10-09T07:11:10.350-05:002012-10-09T07:11:10.350-05:00Ah the self-declared Mocker Michael McCLung has be...Ah the self-declared Mocker Michael McCLung has begun. Let me respond:<br /><br />"but what I think you mean is that poorly written books, from an objective grammar and spelling point of view, would have a negative effect on readers, 'teaching' the wrong way to spell and form coherent sentences."<br /><br />Absolutely correct. Well done. And perhaps by deciphering my hastily written post you've proved my point that the books in our libraries need to be well written.<br /><br />"the greatest threat to literacy globally is access to instruction and reading materials."<br /><br />No one said it wasn't. The discussion was about marketing ebooks to libraries.<br /><br />"In developing countries, there may simply be no books or instructors available. In developed ones, children grow up in home environments where none of their caregivers make reading a daily activity. They do not grow up with a culture that values the printed word, and so do not become readers. Reading becomes a school chore rather than a pleasurable activity."<br /><br />Can't disagree with any of that but it wasn't really what we were talking about. We're discussing "Ebooks in Libraries: They Still Don't Get It!"<br /><br />"I am all for methodical reading instruction materials that teach the basics and fundamentals of the language."<br /><br />That's good to know. I've yet to meat someone who thought otherwise.<br /><br />"This is what 'fostering literacy' means on a nitty-gritty level that applies to libraries."<br /><br />If that means libraries need good books, I agree.<br /><br />"But I can also tell you that systematized phonics instruction, followed by methodical component instruction in reading trumps grammar, and even spelling. They simply aren't as closely connected as one might think."<br /><br />I don't think anyone said they were. But good spelling will trump bad spelling any day. Ask Dan "Potatoe" Quayle.<br /><br />"In short, intimating that poor grammar or spelling in a book will push a reader (even a young reader once they are reading independently for their age level) down the road to illiteracy is baseless."<br /><br />I didn't say it would. I did intimate that it might. You'll only find out whether it is baseless or not when libraries start issuing badly spelled books and the effects of the policy can be tested. But, as I intimated, I'd rather not take the risk. And if you are telling me that you don't care if the books you use to teach with are badly spelled, then remind me never to employ you.<br /><br />"If you want to worry about illiteracy,"<br /><br />I don't want to worry about anything. But thanks for asking.<br /><br />"there are much scarier, much more real threats out there than some poorly edited, self-published book."<br /><br />Ah you tease! Let's hear them.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-27673376733441930172012-10-08T22:50:12.065-05:002012-10-08T22:50:12.065-05:00Okay,
Let's look at this literacy issue:
Ano...Okay,<br /><br />Let's look at this literacy issue:<br /><br />Anonymous sets up some cognitive dissonance when, in the same post he says <br /><br />a)<i>No, I said they might not foster literacy which is ... one of the main functions of a library.</i><br /><br />but then goes on to say <br /><br />b)<i>But yes, I think it could undermine the literacy function of a library if illiterate books were available.</i><br /><br />First off, books cannot be 'illiterate' by their very definition, which simply means unable to read or write. Or rather, all books are 'illiterate' since no book can read or write. You get my drift.<br /><br />Second, and I don't want to put words in your mouth, but what I think you mean is that poorly written books, from an objective grammar and spelling point of view, would have a negative effect on readers, 'teaching' the wrong way to spell and form coherent sentences. If I'm wrong about what you're driving at, let me know. But that's how I read your 'might not foster literacy' comment. To which I reply, utter nonsense.<br /><br /><br />If that's not your contention, then all that's left is a matter of taste. You think self-published books are not the equal to traditionally published books, and so should not be available to library goers, which is patent absurdity.<br /><br />But back to the literacy fostering. My job for the past seven years has been to teach children to read. In that time, one thing has become crystal clear to me: the greatest threat to literacy globally is access to instruction and reading materials. <br /><br />In developing countries, there may simply be no books or instructors available. In developed ones, children grow up in home environments where none of their caregivers make reading a daily activity. They do not grow up with a culture that values the printed word, and so do not become readers. Reading becomes a school chore rather than a pleasurable activity.<br /><br />I am all for methodical reading instruction materials that teach the basics and fundamentals of the language. This is what 'fostering literacy' means on a nitty-gritty level that applies to libraries.<br /><br />But I can also tell you that systematized phonics instruction, followed by methodical component instruction in reading trumps grammar, and even spelling. They simply aren't as closely connected as one might think. <br /><br />In short, intimating that poor grammar or spelling in a book will push a reader (even a young reader once they are reading independently for their age level) down the road to illiteracy is baseless.<br /><br />If you want to worry about illiteracy, there are much scarier, much more real threats out there than some poorly edited, self-published book. <br /><br />Michael McClunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14708067144914238641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-66902421512255670852012-10-08T19:02:45.924-05:002012-10-08T19:02:45.924-05:00Jude Hardin said:
"Hypothetically, libraries...Jude Hardin said:<br /><br />"Hypothetically, libraries could become the #1 source of reading material. It wouldn't matter if you "do" libraries or not. If it's a matter of signing onto a website and clicking on the book you want, FOR FREE, then it wouldn't be any different than signing onto Amazon and clicking on the book you want for $4.99. Except now you would have five more bucks to spend at the grocery store."<br /><br />And if as you propose that libraries are the number 1 source of reading materials and they are giving books away for free, then how exactly does anyone make a living from writing?<br /><br />I think some people are confusing what is good for libraries and what is good for people who want to sell books. They are not necessarily the same thing.<br /><br />Most of the ebooks downloaded for free from Amazon go unread. Or if they are read they are not enjoyed enough to make anyone buy another book from the same author. The conversion rate from free to bought is quite low. It's likely that free books given to libraries would suffer the same fate.<br /><br />It seems that there are thousands of people who download an ebook simply because it's free. The hosts of The Self Publishing Podcast (check iTunes or their website) discussed it at great length in one of their shows. But they have some clever ideas as to how best give away free ebooks and at least maximize the possibility of a sale.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11291165.post-9766900628684626762012-10-08T18:34:42.188-05:002012-10-08T18:34:42.188-05:00Great post!
I have loved libraries and books sinc...Great post!<br /><br />I have loved libraries and books since earliest childhood. Now, with the ability to sign out ebooks from the library, I can get books more easily than ever! I can tell you this - it will make me buy MORE books, not less. When I read a book I like, I'll watch for that author's next book and likely buy it. I'll recommend it at my book club and maybe give it as a gift.<br /><br />I ask for ebook gift cards for my birthday and at Christmas, and received over $250 worth last year. I spent it all with such happiness! I used to spend far less on print books. So bring on the library ebooks, baby, and screw the Big 6!<br /><br />I'm also an indie author - maybe the libraries will want to buy my ebook, which would be a major thrill!<br /><br />P.S. - I'm up at the cottage for Thanksgiving (Canadian) and tethered my cellphone to my laptop to post this. My husband tripped over the connecting cable and unplugged it, causing a LOT of high-level trumpeting from all parties! Fortunately it ended with everyone laughing! :)Inara Everetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02132553483907486858noreply@blogger.com